Michael Atherton slams intentional scheduling of India-Pakistan matches in major ICC tournaments

Table of Contents

Former England captain Michael Atherton has strongly criticized the International Cricket Council (ICC) for deliberately scheduling India-Pakistan matches in major ICC tournaments, accusing the governing body of placing commercial interests above sporting integrity. Writing in The Times, Atherton called for a transparent, merit-based fixture process instead of the current practice of frequently arranging high-profile encounters between these rivals. He highlighted that while the India-Pakistan matches generate enormous global viewership and revenue, exploiting this rivalry diminishes the spirit of fair competition and transforms cricket into a platform for political theatre.

Atherton pointed out that the economic clout of India-Pakistan fixtures is immense, citing the ICC’s broadcast rights cycle for 2023-27 valued at an estimated $3 billion, a figure heavily boosted by these matches. Since the two countries have not played a bilateral series since 2013 due to strained diplomatic relations, their encounters only happen in ICC events and have been repeatedly orchestrated for commercial benefit. This scarcity has increased their marketability, but it has also made the rivalry a proxy for broader geopolitical tensions and propaganda. Atherton argues that cricket, once a vehicle for diplomacy, is now a stage for political posturing, with the fixture repeatedly arranged to satisfy economic and political agendas instead of sporting fairness.

The recent Asia Cup 2025 vividly illustrated these tensions, with on-field and off-field controversies overshadowing the cricket. India’s team refused to shake hands with their Pakistani counterparts after the Pahalgam terror attack, and India declined to accept the tournament trophy from Pakistan’s Cricket Board chairman and interior minister Mohsin Naqvi, who then retained the trophy, sparking outrage on both sides. Pakistan players were seen making provocative gestures during the tournament, and the tension spilled into the Women’s World Cup when captains Harmanpreet Kaur and Fatima Sana avoided handshakes at the toss. These politically charged moments have raised serious concerns about the continued manipulation of cricket fixtures for reasons beyond the sport itself.

Also READ: Record of India vs Pakistan in the finals of multination tournaments

Atherton has urged ICC administrators and tournament organizers to resist the temptation to manipulate tournament fixtures to serve economic and political interests. He advocates for a transparent and merit-based fixture system where India and Pakistan do not necessarily meet at every ICC event. His stance is that there is little justification for a serious sport to craft tournament schedules based on financial gain, especially as the rivalry is increasingly exploited for non-sporting purposes. He recommends that for future broadcast rights cycles, fixture draws should be clear and impartial, letting the teams meet naturally rather than by design. This, he insists, is crucial to preserving cricket’s moral and cultural equilibrium and protecting it from being overwhelmed by political propaganda.

In sum, Atherton’s critique highlighted a critical crossroads for cricket administration: balancing lucrative India-Pakistan clashes with maintaining the game’s integrity and distancing it from political conflicts that threaten to overshadow the sport’s essence. The call for reform follows a year where the greatest cricket rivalry has been marked less by sportsmanship and more by conflict, urging cricket’s global governing body to rethink fixture policies going forward.

Also READ: Stats: Rohit Sharma finishes as India’s most successful ODI captain